Enough of "existential threats". Let's recognize real AI stuff we need NOW
Real world proof that AI should check law codes as I suggested this morning: this case where an ambiguous “and” in one US law may have major impact on thousands of federal prison sentences. Stuff like this must be catched BEFORE sentences. https://www.motherjones.com/crime-justice/2023/10/supreme-court-pulsifer-criminal-justice-drug-definitions/
Speaking of "AI-powered analysis of existing patents" in my last post:
https://mfioretti.substack.com/p/how-to-tell-good-ai-from-bad-or-pointless
check out this #chatgpt analysis of an electronic circuit from 1954
https://twitter.com/BrianRoemmele/status/1710835622842360201
Real world proof that AI should check law codes as I suggested this morning: this case where an ambiguous “and” in one US law may have major impact on thousands of federal prison sentences. Stuff like this must be catched BEFORE sentences. https://www.motherjones.com/crime-justice/2023/10/supreme-court-pulsifer-criminal-justice-drug-definitions/
Speaking of "AI-powered analysis of existing patents" in my last post:
https://mfioretti.substack.com/p/how-to-tell-good-ai-from-bad-or-pointless
check out this #chatgpt analysis of an electronic circuit from 1954
https://twitter.com/BrianRoemmele/status/1710835622842360201